Epistemological Argument: The Nature of Obedience and Knowledge in Protestantism vs. Catholicism

Some of these EA argumentations are going to be no fluff, to the point. I pray that they serve you in thinking deeper, learning more and applying the truth of them to your everyday life.

1. Epistemological Argument: The Nature of Obedience and Knowledge in Protestantism vs. Catholicism

A. The Protestant Epistemic Limitation: Morality Over Worship

1. Protestants prioritize moral knowledge as the primary form of obedience – Their understanding of faith often hinges on a personal interpretation of Scripture, leading to a framework where obedience means following moral precepts rather than engaging in liturgical or sacramental acts.

2. Epistemic Reductionism – Protestantism’s reliance on sola scriptura and private interpretation reduces Christianity to what can be intellectually grasped, eliminating sacramental realism and the participatory nature of worship.

3. Rejection of Objective Worship – Protestant theology, particularly in its Reformed branches, rejects the idea that God commands specific acts of worship that are binding on all believers. Instead, worship is seen as a spontaneous, subjective act rather than a structured, divinely instituted practice.

B. Catholicism’s Broader Epistemology: Sacramental & Liturgical Knowledge

1. Knowledge in Catholicism is not just intellectual but participatory – We come to know Christ not just by thinking about Him or following His moral teachings, but by worshiping Him in the way He commanded (Lk 22:19-20; Jn 6:53-58).

2. Sacraments engage the whole person – Baptism, the Eucharist, and Confession are not mere moral affirmations but ontological transformations where grace is objectively given.

3. Faith is more than belief; it is embodied in ritual and sacrifice – The Catholic Church maintains that lex orandi, lex credendi (“the law of prayer is the law of belief”), meaning that worship and doctrine are inseparable.

C. Protestant “Legalism” as a Hidden Constraint

1. Despite rejecting “legalism,” Protestantism has moralistic rigidity – In rejecting sacraments and liturgical worship, Protestantism ironically replaces them with a hyper-focus on moral conduct, making obedience purely ethical rather than holistic.

2. Without an external authority like the Church, “obedience” is subjective – Protestantism often shifts the burden of faith to individual moral discipline, which creates a paradox: while accusing Catholics of legalism, they end up following a more burdensome “law” of self-enforced morality.

3. Subjectivism leads to disunity – Without a sacramental structure, moral interpretations vary widely, leading to doctrinal fragmentation.

---

2. Scriptural Argument: Biblical Obedience Involves More Than Morality

A. Worship & Sacrifice Are Central to Obedience

1. Cain vs. Abel: God Demands Right Worship (Gen 4:3-5)

   • Abel’s offering was accepted, while Cain’s was rejected—not because of moral conduct but because God demands proper worship.

   • Protestants often claim that worship style is personal, but Scripture contradicts this. God expects right worship, not just moral effort.

2. The Passover: Obedience Requires Ritual, Not Just Morality (Ex 12:1-28)

   • The Israelites weren’t saved merely by being moral; they had to participate in a ritual act of sacrifice (the Passover lamb).

   • This foreshadows the Eucharist, where Christ is the new Passover Lamb (1 Cor 5:7, Jn 6:53-56).

3. The Golden Calf Incident: Wrong Worship Brings Judgment (Ex 32)

   • The Israelites still believed in God and upheld His moral law, yet they were condemned for false worship.

   • This shows that proper liturgical obedience matters, not just moral behavior.

B. Christ Institutes Worship and Sacrament, Not Just Morality

1. Jesus’ Commands Involve Ritual Worship

   • “Do this in remembrance of me” (Lk 22:19) – Christ commands a liturgical act (the Eucharist), not just moral teachings.

   • “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you” (Jn 6:53) – Christ makes sacramental participation a requirement, not an option.

2. Christ Affirms Liturgical and Priestly Worship

   • Jesus upholds the priesthood (Mt 16:18-19; Jn 20:21-23), giving the Apostles power to bind and loose sins—something that Protestant theology lacks.

   • Protestant worship, devoid of a sacrificial priesthood, is incomplete compared to the biblical model.

C. Apostolic Practice Shows Worship & Sacrifice Are Necessary

1. The Early Church Followed a Liturgical Pattern

   • “They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.” (Acts 2:42)

   • The first Christians gathered for Eucharistic worship, not just moral teaching.

2. Paul Condemns Those Who Fail to Discern the Eucharist (1 Cor 11:27-29)

   • St. Paul warns that improper participation in the Eucharist brings judgment, showing that Christianity is not just moral but sacramental.

D. Protestantism’s Morality-Only Model Lacks Biblical Support

• Scripture never reduces obedience to morality alone.

• Biblical faith always involves ritual acts of worship, sacrifice, and sacramental participation.

• Protestantism removes these essential components, leaving only personal morality as the standard for obedience.

---

Conclusion: Protestantism’s Narrow View of Obedience Is Epistemologically & Biblically Deficient

1. Epistemologically, Protestantism limits knowledge of God to personal moral effort and intellectual understanding, rejecting sacramental participation.

2. Biblically, obedience has always included worship, sacrifice, and ritual acts, not just moral behavior.

3. By rejecting sacramental worship, Protestantism ironically creates a different kind of “legalism”, where Christianity is reduced to subjective moralism rather than holistic obedience to God.

Thus, far from being "legalistic," Catholicism is actually more biblically consistent in its understanding of obedience, integrating worship, sacrifice, and morality as God intended.

And this leads us to…

1. Epistemological Argument: The Protestant Dilemma—Scripture Alone Requires an External Criterion

A. Protestantism Reduces Christianity to Morality

1. Protestants often claim that Catholicism is "legalistic" because it teaches obedience through both moral conduct and sacramental worship.

2. However, Protestants still demand obedience—but to what?

   • Their framework boils down to moralism, where Christianity is primarily about obeying Christ's moral teachings found in Scripture.

   • They reject sacramental participation, hierarchical authority, and binding tradition, leaving only a moral code as the measure of obedience.

B. The Epistemic Problem: How Do Protestants Know Their Scripture is Correct?

1. Protestants derive morality from Scripture—but this assumes that:

   • They possess the correct canon of Scripture.

   • Their interpretation of Scripture is correct.

   • The Bible is the ultimate authority, despite no verse saying so.

2. Yet, they have no epistemic foundation for knowing these things apart from the Church.

   • If Scripture is their only guide, they need an external standard to know that:

     • The books they use are the correct ones.

     • Their interpretation is the right one.

C. The Canon Problem: The Bible Itself Does Not Identify Its Own Books

1. The Protestant canon is historically questionable

   • The Bible does not contain an inspired table of contents.

   • Who decided which books belong in Scripture?

     • Protestants claim that Scripture is "self-authenticating," but this is circular reasoning—you cannot prove a book’s divine authority using the book itself.

     • The early Church determined the canon, yet Protestants reject that same Church’s authority.

2. Luther removed books based on private judgment

   • The original Christian Bible contained the Deuterocanonical books, which Protestants reject.

   • Luther even wanted to remove James and Revelation because they didn’t fit his theology.

   • By what authority did he do this?

   • If Protestants claim the Church got it wrong for 1,500 years, how do they trust any part of the canon?

D. The Interpretation Problem: Without an Infallible Church, Moralism Becomes Subjective

1. Whose interpretation of morality is correct?

   • If Protestants believe Scripture alone is enough to determine morality, then:

     • Why do different Protestant groups disagree on moral issues (e.g., divorce, contraception, homosexuality)?

     • If morality is clear in Scripture, why is there so much doctrinal division?

2. Protestants ultimately become their own final authority

   • Without an external, infallible standard, every Protestant relies on their personal interpretation to determine what is moral.

   • This creates moral relativism within Protestantism, even though it claims to uphold objective moral truths.

E. Catholicism Resolves This by Providing an External Criterion

1. Catholics can epistemologically justify their canon

   • The early Church, guided by apostolic tradition and the Holy Spirit, identified the correct books.

   • The Magisterium has divine authority to safeguard and interpret Scripture (1 Tim 3:15).

   • We don’t just assume the canon is right; we have an authoritative tradition to confirm it.

2. Catholicism provides a consistent moral framework

   • Moral law is taught by the Church, not determined by private interpretation.

   • This prevents the fragmentation and contradictions seen in Protestant moral theology.

---

2. Scriptural Argument: Scripture Alone is an Incoherent Standard Without an Authority

A. The Bible Teaches That Authority is Necessary

1. Jesus establishes an authoritative Church, not just a book

   • “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me.” (Lk 10:16)

   • Christ didn’t leave us a Bible—He left us a Church that teaches with His authority.

2. The Church, not Scripture alone, is the foundation of truth

   • “The Church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth.” (1 Tim 3:15)

   • Protestants claim the Bible is the sole rule of faith, but Scripture itself says the Church is the foundation of truth.

3. The Apostles taught through oral tradition and authority

   • “So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught, whether by word of mouth or by letter from us.” (2 Thess 2:15)

   • The Bible explicitly affirms tradition and the Church’s teaching authority.

B. The Bible Does Not Teach Sola Scriptura

1. Where does Scripture say that Scripture alone is the final authority?

   • Nowhere.

   • Protestants assume that because Scripture is God’s Word, it must be the only authority. But this is an unbiblical assumption.

   • Jesus never commands the Apostles to write a Bible—He commands them to teach and make disciples (Mt 28:19-20).

2. The early Christians did not rely on Scripture alone

   • The New Testament wasn’t even completed for decades after Christ’s resurrection.

   • The Church functioned through apostolic teaching and sacred tradition.

   • If early Christians had no complete Bible, how were they able to follow Christ?

C. The Canon of Scripture is a Catholic Product

1. The early Church determined which books were Scripture

   • The Council of Carthage (AD 397) and the Council of Hippo (AD 393) confirmed the canon.

   • The same Church that determined the canon also upheld sacramental worship, the Eucharist, and apostolic succession—yet Protestants reject these.

2. If Protestants accept the Bible, they must accept the Church that canonized it

   • Protestantism uses a canon determined by Catholic bishops while denying the authority of those bishops.

   • This is self-defeating—if the Church got the canon right, then its authority should be trusted on other matters too.

---

3. Conclusion: Protestantism’s Moralism is Epistemologically and Scripturally Deficient

1. Protestants rely on Scripture alone for morality, yet they have no objective way to verify that Scripture is the correct canon.

2. Without an authoritative Church, Protestant morality is subject to endless interpretations and contradictions.

3. Scripture itself teaches that authority lies in the Church, not in individual interpretation.

4. The Bible’s canon was established by the Catholic Church—rejecting that Church means rejecting the very foundation of their moral standard.

Final Thought: Protestantism’s claim to base morality on Scripture alone is self-defeating—because without an infallible authority, they cannot prove they have the correct Scripture in the first place.